MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mortality and Hospitalization Linked to Fine Particulate Matter in Canada: Is There a Trend in Risk between 2001 and 2012?

2018· article· en· W2920220196 on OpenAlex
Hwashin Hyun Shin, Harun Kalayci, Lani Haque, Marc Smith‐Doiron, Branka Jovic, Wesley S. Burr, Dave Stieb

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsTrent UniversityHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationEnvironmental healthDemographyEpidemiologyRisk assessmentInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Air Health Trend Indicator is designed to estimate public health risk related to short-term exposure to air pollution and to detect trends in annual national health risks. Trends in risk may reflect changes over time in population susceptibility or in composition of fine particulate matter or more generally in the air pollution mix.Design: Daily PM2.5, mortality, morbidity, and weather data for 22 cities (about 50% of the total population) were collected for 2001-2012. A Bayesian hierarchical model was employed to estimate annual national associations by season, lag of effect, sex and age group (≤65 vs >65). Circulatory (ICD_I00-I99) and respiratory (ICD_J00-J99) causes were examined for both mortality and morbidity (hospital admissions). Results: Annual population weighted PM2.5 concentrations decreased gradually by 14% from 8 to7 µg/m3 nationally over the 12 year period. While population has increased by 13%, the ratios of mortality and morbidity to the population have decreased by 6% and 14%, respectively. In relation with PM2.5 both mortality and morbidity showed higher circulatory risk for cold season, higher respiratory risk for warm season, higher risk for seniors (>65), and sex-specific differences. Females were at higher risk (1.9% vs 1.1% per 1 µg/m3) for circulatory mortality but males were at higher risk (0.26% vs 0.02%) for respiratory morbidity. No apparent trends were observed in PM2.5 risk over time.Discussions: Despite downward trends in PM2.5 concentrations, mortality and morbidity rates, there was no apparent trend in PM2.5 risk. The 12-year period may be not long enough to detect trends if they exist. While the age difference in risk has been consistently reported, the sex difference has been inconsistent and thus needs further investigation. These findings could differentiate adverse effects of PM2.5 on mortality and morbidity by identifying sub-populations susceptible to PM2.5 by season, age, and sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it