(Invited) Structural Properties and Carrier Transport in Axial Silicon-Germanium Nanowire Heterojunctions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in forming semiconductor heterojunctions within spatially confined nanoscale objects, including nanowires (NWs), show that the traditional limitations in the lattice-mismatched hetero-growth can be challenged. In various III-V semiconductor NWs, abrupt heterojunctions have been successfully demonstrated using the vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) growth for GaAs/InAs (7% mismatch) and InAs/InP (3% mismatch) heterojunctions. In group IV semiconductors, the approach is complicated not only by the 4.2% lattice mismatch between Si and Ge but also because Si and Ge both have a quite high solubility in the Au-Si catalyst. During chemical vapor deposition (CVD) based VLS growth using SiH4 and GeH4 (or similar gases), a supply of Si remains effectively “on” in the catalyst, and Si effectively intermixes with the arriving Ge even if the SiH4 flow is already switched “off”. One way to address this problem is to choose a catalyst with a lower Si solubility, e.g. AlAu2 and AgAu. Another possibility is to significantly reduce growth temperature before turning a GeH4 source “on”. Using the latter technique, we fabricated Si-Ge heterojunction NWs with nearly ideal interface and only an 8 nm thick SiGe transition layer between straight and nearly micron-long Si and Ge NW segments and analyzed their structural and electrical properties. The observed changes in the photoluminescence and Raman spectra as function of temperature, non-linear and rectifying current-voltage characteristics, strong flicker noise and damped current oscillations with frequencies of 20-30 MHz are explained using the proposed SiGe heterojunction NW energy band diagram including the energy states associated with the NW surface (and near-surface) structural imperfections revealed by transmission electron microscopy and a mismatch in Si and Ge coefficients of thermal expansion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".