Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange and Electron Capture Dissociation to Interrogate the Conformation of Gaseous Melittin Ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a need in the field of biological mass spectrometry for structural tools which can report on regional, rather than solely global, structure of gaseous protein ions. Site-specific hydrogen-deuterium (H/D) exchange has shown promise in fulfilling this need, but requires additional method development to prove its utility. In this study, we use H/D exchange and electron capture dissociation (ECD) to probe the gaseous structure of two peptides which are α-helical in solution and which differ by a single point mutation. Global H/D exchange levels, ECD fragmentation profiles, and region specific H/D exchange profiles are compared between wild type (WT) melittin, which adopts a hinged helix conformation in solution, and a mutant P14A melittin which folds into a single helix in solution. High protection from H/D exchange by both peptides is consistent with retention of secondary structure in the gas phase (or refolding into some other compact structure). The P14A mutant melittin exhibits lower ECD fragmentation efficiency than WT melittin, suggesting that it contains more secondary structure in the gas phase, which may indicate that these peptides retain some memory of their solution-phase structures. Examination of the isotopic distributions of fragment ions derived from H/D exchange with subsequent ECD reveals that the C-terminus of these peptides adopts multiple conformations. The results reported here offer insight into the stability of alpha helices in the gas phase, and also highlight the value of combining gas-phase H/D exchange with electron capture dissociation to interrogate gaseous peptide conformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".