An Extended Stochastic Goal Mixed Integer Programming for Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Amman Stock Exchange
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper optimally solves the portfolio selection problem that consists of multi assets in a continuous time period to achieve the optimal trade-off between multi-objectives. In this paper, the Stochastic Goal Mixed Integer programming of Stoyan (2009) is extended. The empirical contributions of this research presented on extending the SGMIP model by adding information as a new factor that selects the portfolio elements. The information element used as a portfolio managing characteristics to see whether it is applicable for different problems. The data was collected on a daily basis for all the parameters of the individual stock. Brownian motion formula was used to predict the stock price in the future time period. SP framework used to capture numerous sources of uncertainty and to formulate the portfolio problem. The main challenge of this model is that it contains additional real-world objective and multi types of financial assets, which form a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP). This large-scale problem solved using Optimising Programming Language (OPL) and decomposition algorithm to improve the memory allocation and CPU time. A fascinating result was obtained from the portfolio algorithm design. The ESGMIP portfolio outperforms the Index portfolio return. Under uncertain environment, the availability of information rationalized the diversity when the dynamic portfolio invested in one financial instrument (stocks), and tend to be diversifiable when invested in more than one financial instrument (stock and bond). This work presents a novel extended SGMIP model to reach an optimal solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".