MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920595125 · doi:10.1101/567081

EPIP: MHC-I epitope prediction integrating mass spectrometry derived motifs and tissue-specific expression profiles

2019· preprint· en· W2920595125 on OpenAlexaff
Weipeng Hu, Si Qiu, Youping Li, Xinxin Lin, Le Zhang, Haitao Xiang, Xing Han, Sitao Zhu, Lei Chen, Sha Li, Wenhui Li, Zhe Ren, Guixue Hou, Zhilong Lin, Jianliang Lu, Geng Liu, Bo Li, Leo J. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen MunicipalityGovernment of Jiangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEpitopeHuman leukocyte antigenComputational biologyBiologyAntigenGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Accurate prediction of epitopes presented by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is crucial for personalized cancer immunotherapies targeting T cell epitopes. Mass spectrometry (MS) profiling of eluted HLA ligands, which provides high-throughput measurements of HLA associated peptides in vivo , can be used to faithfully model the presentation of epitopes on the cell surface. In addition, gene expression profiles measured by RNA-seq data in a specific cell/tissue type can significantly improve the performance of epitope presentation prediction. However, although large amount of high-quality MS data of HLA-bound peptides is being generated in recent years, few provide matching RNA-seq data, which makes incorporating gene expression into epitope prediction difficult. Methods We collected publicly available HLA peptidome and matching RNA-seq data of 34 cell lines derived from various sources. We built position score specific matrixes (PSSMs) for 21 HLA-I alleles based on these MS data, then used logistic regression (LR) to model the relationship among PSSM score, gene expression and peptide length to predict whether a peptide could be presented in each of the cell line. We further built a universal LR model, termed Epitope Presentation Integrated Prediction (EPIP), based on more than 180,000 unique HLA ligands collected from public sources and ~3,000 HLA ligands generated by ourselves, to predict epitope presentation for 66 common HLA-I alleles. Results When evaluating EPIP on large, independent HLA eluted ligand datasets, it performed substantially better than other popular methods, including MixMHCpred (v2.0), NetMHCpan (v4.0), and MHCflurry (v1.2.2), with an average 0.1% positive predictive value (PPV) of 52.01%, compared to 37.24%, 36.96%, 24.90% and 23.76% achieved by MixMHCpred, NetMHCpan-4.0 (EL), NetMHCpan-4.0 (BA) and MHCflurry, respectively. It is also comparable to EDGE, a recent deep learning-based model that is not publicly available, on predicting epitope presentation and selecting immunogenic cancer neoantigens. However, the simplicity and flexibility of EPIP makes it easier to be applied in diverse situations, and we demonstrated this by generating MS data for the HCC4006 cell line and adding the support of HLA-A*33:03 to EPIP. EPIP is publicly available as a web tool < http://epip.genomics.cn/ >. Conclusions we have developed an easy to use, publicly available epitope prediction tool, EPIP, that incorporates information from both MS and RNA-seq data, and demonstrated its superior performance over existing public methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207