Vegfa/vegfr2 signaling is necessary for zebrafish islet vessel development, but is dispensable for beta-cell and alpha-cell formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying zebrafish pancreatic islet vascularization have not been well characterized. We sought to determine the angiogenic factors responsible for islet vascularization and assess whether an absence of endothelial cells affects beta-cell and alpha-cell formation. We used a double transgenic zebrafish Tg(fli1:EGFP; insa:tagRFP) to label endothelial cells and beta-cells, respectively. Beta-cells developed adjacent to endothelial cells and by 72 hours post fertilization (hpf) the zebrafish pancreatic islet was highly vascularized. Zebrafish beta-cells express vascular endothelial growth factors (vegf), vegfaa and vegfab. Double knockdown of vegfaa and vegfab or the primary Vegfa receptors (Vegfr2), kdr and kdrl, resulted in vessel deficient islets. While beta-cell and alpha-cell numbers remained unchanged in vessel deficient islets, insulina expression was downregulated relative to controls. Vegfaa/Vegfab-Vegfr2 signaling is necessary for proper islet vessel development, but not for the initial formation of beta-cells and alpha-cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".