MétaCan
← all works

Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019

2019· review· en· 1,965 citations· W2920797638 on OpenAlex· 10.1183/13993003.00164-2019

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Canadian funderA Canadian agency funded it. The work may carry no Canadian affiliation at all.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread
0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Precision medicine is a patient-specific approach that integrates all relevant clinical, genetic and biological information in order to optimise the therapeutic benefit relative to the possibility of side-effects for each individual. Recent clinical trials have shown that higher blood eosinophil counts are associated with a greater efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Blood eosinophil counts are a biomarker with potential to be used in clinical practice, to help target ICS treatment with more precision in COPD patients with a history of exacerbations despite appropriate bronchodilator treatment.The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017 pharmacological treatment algorithms, based on the ABCD assessment, can be applied relatively easily to treatment-naive individuals at initial presentation. However, their use is more problematic during follow-up in patients who are already on maintenance treatment. There is a need for a different system to guide COPD pharmacological management during follow-up.Recent large randomised controlled trials have provided important new information concerning the therapeutic effects of ICSs and long-acting bronchodilators on exacerbations. The new evidence regarding blood eosinophils and inhaled treatments, and the need to distinguish between initial and follow-up pharmacological management, led to changes in the GOLD pharmacological treatment recommendations. This article explains the evidence and rationale for the GOLD 2019 pharmacological treatment recommendations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
University of British ColumbiaMcGill University Health Centre
Funders
Manchester Biomedical Research CentreNational Institutes of HealthGenentechGrifolsRegeneron PharmaceuticalsYork UniversityAstraZenecaChiesi FarmaceuticiCSL BehringSunovionGilead SciencesSanofiAmerican Thoracic SocietyPfizerBiogenGlaxoSmithKlineBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchVeracyteTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
Keywords
MedicineObstructive lung diseaseIntensive care medicinePulmonary diseaseLung diseaseGold standard (test)LungInternal medicine
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes