MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920860181

Przedsiębiorczość akademicka. Dobre praktyki [Academic Entrepreneurship: Good Practices]

2011· article· pl· W2920860181 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bogusław Plawgo, Magdalena Klimczuk‐Kochańska, Marta Juchnicka, Mariusz Citkowski

Bibliographic record

VenueMPRA Paper · 2011
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Organizational Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipPolitical scienceMember statesThe InternetGood practiceManagementBusiness administrationBusinessEuropean unionEngineeringLibrary scienceComputer scienceEngineering ethicsEconomicsWorld Wide WebLawInternational trade
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polish Abstract: Niniejsza publikacja jest zbiorem „dobrych praktyk przedsiebiorczości akademickiej zidentyfi kowanych nie tylko w Polsce ale takze w Stanach Zjednoczonych, Niemczech, Chinach, Szwajcarii, Belgii, Wloszech, Szwecji, Kanadadzie i Wielkiej Brytanii. Praktyki pochodzą z roznych sektorow gospodarki takich jak: biotechnologia, medycyna, farmacja, biofarmacja, elektronika i automatyka, polprzewodniki, nanotechnologia, elektronika, elektromechanika, analiza środowiskowa, informatyka, internet, multimedia i komunikacja. Wskazano takze przyklady „przedsiebiorczych uniwersytetow, w przypadku ktorych mamy do czynienia z świadomym nastawieniem calych spoleczności akademickich na rozwoj przedsiebiorczości w wielu sektorach gospodarczych jako podstawy wlasnej strategii rozwoju. Choc zaprezentowane przyklady mogą sie wydawac odlegle, to lączy je umiejetnośc przekuwania wiedzy generowanej w sferze nauki na sukcesy ekonomiczne. Korzyści osiągają nie tylko bezpośredni przedsiebiorcy akademiccy, ale takze innowacyjne przedsiebiorstwa, regiony czy kraje oraz same uczelnie. English Abstract: This publication is a collection of good of academic entrepreneurship identified not only in Poland, but also in the United States, Germany, China, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, Sweden, Canada and the UK .. The practices come from various sectors of the economy such as: biotechnology, medicine, pharmacy, biopharmaceutics, electronics and automation, semiconductors, nanotechnology, electronics, electromechanics, environmental analysis, IT, internet, multimedia and communication. Examples of enterprising are also indicated, where we are dealing with the conscious attitude of entire academic communities at development of entrepreneurship in many economic sectors as the basis of own development strategy. Although the presented examples may seem distant, they are connected by the ability to translate knowledge generated in the sphere of science into economic successes. Not only direct academia benefits, but also innovative enterprises, regions or countries and universities themselves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.011
Scholarly communication0.0180.007
Open science0.0020.015
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMPRA PaperSame topicManagement and Organizational PracticesFrench-language works237,207