MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Crohnʼs Disease: Results From IM-UNITI Long-Term Extension Through 3 Years: Presidential Poster Award

2018· article· en· W2920882777 on OpenAlexaff
William J. Sandborn, Paul Rutgeerts, Christopher Gasink, Reese Patel, Bin Zou, Jewel Johanns, Bruce E. Sands, Stephen B. Hanauer, Stephan Targan, Subrata Ghosh, Willem de Villiers, Jean–Frédéric Colombel, Brian Feagan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiscontinuationPopulationRandomized controlled trialUstekinumabClinical trialPlaceboPediatricsInternal medicineDiseaseAdalimumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Ustekinumab (UST) is a mAB to IL 12/23p40 approved for treatment of moderate-tosevere active Crohn's disease (CD). The IM-UNITI long-term extension (LTE) evaluates efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) UST through 5yrs, with results through wk156 (efficacy assessed at wk152) reported herein. Methods: 1281 patients (pts) entered the maintenance study, including 397 UST induction responders in the primary population (randomized to SC placebo (PBO), n=133; UST 90mg q12w, n=132; or UST 90mg q8w, n=132). A one-time dose adjustment to 90mg q8w occurred in randomized pts who met loss of response criteria from wks8-32. Non-randomized pts included: PBO induction responders who continued PBO; PBO induction non-responders who received UST 130mg IV then UST 90mg SC q12w if in clinical response at wk8; and UST induction non-responders who received UST 90mg SC and if in clinical response at wk8, continued UST 90mg SC q8w. All pts who completed treatment through wk44 were eligible to enter the LTE continuing the same treatment. This included 567 UST pts, of which 237 were from the primary population. PBO pts discontinued treatment after study unblinding following Wk44 DBL. Efficacy was assessed q12wks prior to study unblinding and then at UST dosing visits. Results: Discontinuation of study agent prior to wk156 occurred in 29.6% of 567 UST pts. Table 1 presents analyses for randomized pts who entered LTE. Among all UST pts, remission rates at wk152 were 56.3% & 55.1% for q12w and q8w, respectively. In an ITT analysis of randomized pts from maintenance wk 0-152, 38% (49/129) of UST induction responder q12w pts and 43%(55/128) of q8w pts were in remission at wk152. Antibody to UST rates through wk156 remained low, occurring in 4.0%(8/202) of randomized pts continuously receiving UST and 4.8%(27/567) of all pts treated with UST. Safety events (per 100 pt-yrs) were not higher among all UST pts entering LTE compared to PBO from wk44-156, including AE's (325.26 vs 358.8), SAEs (19.4 vs 23.11), and serious infections (4.14 vs 4.62), with 1061.6 pt-yrs of follow-up among UST pts and 173.1 pt-yrs of follow-up among PBO pts. Among all UST pts, 3 deaths (ESRD, acute MI, sepsis) and 2 non-NMSC malignancies (adenocarcinoma of small intestine and CML) were reported from wks 96-156. Conclusion: SC UST maintained clinical response and remission through 3yrs in a substantial proportion of pts, particularly those naïve to anti-TNFs. UST was well-tolerated through 3yrs with no new safety signals.604 Figure 1. IM-UNITI Efficacy Assessments at Week 152 Among Randomized Patients who entered LTE

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→