Performance and microbiological safety testing after multiple use cycles and hydrogen peroxide sterilization of a 5‐mm vessel‐sealing device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional and microbiological safety of a single-use laparoscopic vessel-sealing device in a multiuse setting. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Twelve 5-mm LigaSure Maryland jaw devices. METHODS: Handsets underwent repeated test cycles until failure. The handset packaging was opened, and handsets were agitated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The PBS was removed, centrifuged, and submitted for culture. Canine ovariectomy was simulated on cadaveric tissue, after which vascular seal quality was evaluated by pressure testing of sealed porcine carotid arteries. The handsets were cleaned and sterilized with hydrogen peroxide gas and repackaged. RESULTS: Mean ± SD cycles to failure was 7.7 ± 2.8, with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 12 use cycles achieved. Eleven of the 12 handsets failed by failure of handset activation after depression of the activation trigger. Only 1 handset failed to hold an adequate vascular seal under 300 mm Hg of pressure. No handset exhibited positive bacterial culture at any cycle. CONCLUSION: The sterilization method used in this study resulted in an excellent microbiological safety profile. Most of the handsets failed by activation button failure. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Under the conditions of this study, hydrogen peroxide sterilization achieved microbiological safety. Handsets can successfully be reused until activation button failure without negative effects on the vascular seal or increased risk of infection to the patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".