Neurophysiological Muscle Activation Scheme for Controlling Vocal Fold Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A physiologically-based scheme that incorporates inherent neurological fluctuations in the activation of intrinsic laryngeal muscles into a lumped-element vocal fold model is proposed. Herein, muscles are activated through a combination of neural firing rate and recruitment of additional motor units, both of which have stochastic components. The mathematical framework and underlying physiological assumptions are described, and the effects of the fluctuations are tested via a parametric analysis using a body-cover model of the vocal folds for steady-state sustained vowels. The inherent muscle activation fluctuations have a bandwidth that varies with the firing rate, yielding both low and high-frequency components. When applying the proposed fluctuation scheme to the voice production model, changes in the dynamics of the system can be observed, ranging from fluctuations in the fundamental frequency to unstable behavior near bifurcation regions. The resulting coefficient of variation of the model parameters is not uniform with muscle activation. The stochastic components of muscle activation influence both the fine structure variability and the ability to achieve a target value for pitch control. These components can have a significant impact on the vocal fold parameters, as well as the outputs of the voice production model. Good agreement was found when contrasting the proposed scheme with prior experimental studies accounting for variability in vocal fold posturing and spectral characteristics of the muscle activation signal. The proposed scheme constitutes a novel and physiologically-based approach for controlling lumped-element models for normal voice production and can be extended to explore neuropathological conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".