MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920989105 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.160

A161 INFECTION WITH THE TAPEWORM HYMENOLEPIS DIMINUTA EVOKES A MASSIVE, BUT DELAYED INCREASE IN TUFT CELLS IN THE MURINE INTESTINE

2019· article· en· W2920989105 on OpenAlexaff
Sruthi Rajeev, S J Wang, Laurie E. Wallace, Keith A. Sharkey, Derek M. McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTuftBiologyHymenolepis diminutaIleumIntestinal epitheliumFlatwormEpitheliumSmall intestineImmunologyPathologyCestodaEndocrinologyHelminthsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intestinal epithelium is composed of multiple cell types that work in harmony towards digestion, absorption, defence and repair. The enteric tuft cell is a chemosensory cell that produces IL-25 as an early signal following infection with nematode (roundworm) parasites to activate innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) and engage Th2 immunity. Despite rapid expulsion from the non-permissive mouse host, the cestode, H. diminuta is non-invasive and causes no damage to the gut. It is unknown if tuft cell activation is a component of the host response to enteric infection with flatworm parasites, and H. diminuta in particular. To assess changes in enteric tuft cells following infection with the non-invasive, non-damaging tapeworm, H. diminuta. BALB/c mice were infected with 5 H. diminuta cysticercoids and cryostat sections of mid- jejunum, ileum and colon were studied at 5, 8 and 11 days post-infection. Time-matched, non-infected mice served as controls. Sections were immunostained using antibodies against doublecortin-like kinase -1 (DCLK-1), a tuft cell-specific marker, and blindly scored for tuft cell number. DCLK-1+ cells in the epithelium were readily detectable in the gut of non-infected and infected mice. Sections of the intestine appeared histologically normal at all time points. Intestine from 5 and 8 days post-infection showed no change in tuft cell number compared to non-infected mice. However, a dramatic tuft cell hyperplasia (~10-fold increase) in jejunal, ileal and colonic sections was apparent at 11 days post-infection (nb. H. diminuta is a parasite of the small intestine), by which time the worm has been expelled from the gut. There was a noticeable aggregation of tuft cells around sections of Peyer’s patches in the ileum from infected mice. Tuft cell hyperplasia along the gut accompanies the later stages of infection with H. diminuta, that may promote a generalized Th2 environment during and post-infection. Factors (e.g. IL4Rα) responsible for the tuft cell response, any tuft cell heterogeneity, and a role for tuft cells in worm expulsion need to be addressed. CIHRNSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysFrench-language works237,207