MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921017467 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1800036

Quantitative Mineralogy and Geochemical Coherence Through Siroquant Validation: Implications For a Kaolinite-Gibbsite-Albite Occurrence in Heterogeneous Paleozoic Bedrock of the Iberian Massif (NW Spain)

2019· article· en· W2921017467 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sara Alcalde‐Aparicio, Fernando Gómez‐Fernández, Eduardo Alonso-Herrero, Manuel Vidal-Bardán

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleozoicHumanitiesBedrockGeologyGibbsiteKaoliniteArchaeologyGeochemistryGeographyArtGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[EN] A multi-methodological approach that consists of the systematic integration of detailed mineralogical, micromorphological, and geochemical features has been used to characterize a number of heterogeneous siliceous Paleozoic materials including low- to very-low-grade metamorphic crystalline rocks and siliciclastic and other detrital materials Ordovician to Carboniferous in age. Included in the same sequence are black slates, quartzites, and shales with alternating beds of sandstone, mudstone, and, occasionally, intermediate coal beds. A set of complementary and sequential analyses was performed to confirm the primary mineral assemblages, particularly the presence of unusual secondary silicates in the clay fraction. The sequential mineralogical methods included microscopic petrographic analysis (MOP), scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD). Major elements were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) and minor elements (in some cases) using inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS). Mineral quantification was carried out using the Siroquant system which is based on the QXRPD Rietveld technique. The essential minerals are mainly represented by K-rich dioctahedral varieties of white mica (muscovite) or illite, Fe-rich chlorites (Mg-rich chamosites), plagioclases (albite), and quartz, occasionally with kaolinite or even gibbsite. Up to 12 trace minerals such as iron oxides and sulfides were identified in some assemblages. After performing a validation procedure, a high level of consistency was observed between the major element oxide percentages, inferred from the XRPD study, and the equivalent oxide proportions determined by direct chemical analysis. The strong linear correlation shows that the percentages of K2O, Na2O, and MgO are also consistent with the quantitative clay mineralogy. The abundance of albite and the presence of iron-rich chlorites, together with the identification of kaolinite and occasionally gibbsite, support the interpretation of these bedrock materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207