MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921051789 · doi:10.2166/wqrj.2000.039

Preferential Leaching of Water and Chloride in a Clay Loam Soil as Affected by Tillage and Rainfall Intensity

2000· article· en· W2921051789 on OpenAlexaffabout
J.J. Miller, B.J. Lamond, N. J. Sweetland, Francis J. Larney

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeaching (pedology)LoamTillageMacroporeLysimeterEnvironmental scienceSoil waterGroundwaterHydrology (agriculture)Soil scienceAgronomyChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There is a concern that preferential flow (i.e., bypass of soil matrix) of water and chemicals through soil macropores may enhance leaching below the root zone of agricultural crops, which may impact groundwater quality. Our objective was to investigate the nature of preferential flow in a clay loam soil and to ascertain the potential impact of tillage practice and rainfall intensity. We utilized a long-term (since 1968) conventional tillage (heavy-duty cultivator) and no-till field located at Lethbridge in southern Alberta. Four large (46 x 46 x 51 cm) undisturbed soil blocks were excavated from each tillage field (unreplicated) during the fallow phase of a wheat-fallow rotation. The soil blocks were transported to the laboratory, stored under drying conditions (32 months), and rainfall-leaching experiments conducted under unsaturated, transient conditions. In the laboratory, we attached a funnel-lysimeter consisting of 64 square funnels or cells to the bottom of each block. Three rainfall experiments were conducted on each block and a solid chloride tracer was applied to the top of the soil block before each rainfall event. Blocks were at a soil water content of field capacity prior to each rainfall. A total of 22 mm of rainfall was applied in 60, 30 and 15 min, corresponding to rainfall intensities of 22, 44 and 88 mm h-1, respectively. The volume of water outflow and concentration of chloride in each cell was determined after each rainfall event. Water outflow through >98% of cells indicated that many soil pores contributed to leaching of water. Convex-shaped curves of cumulative water outflow from cells versus cumulative area indicated non-uniform water flow, but the degree of water flow preference was low. Semi-variograms of cell water outflow indicated random flow, and the pattern of cell water outflow was stable with time and among rainfall intensities. Chloride outflow in <14% of cells indicated that only a few soil pores contributed to leaching of chloride. Total mass loss of chloride from each soil block was <0.1% of the total amount applied, which suggested most chloride was retained within the soil block, and was more consistent with immobile water rather than anion exclusion. Tillage practice seemed to exert a stronger influence on water outflow parameters than rainfall intensity, with a trend towards greater preferential flow of water under CT than NT. Total block water outflow increased with greater rainfall intensity for CT, and to a lesser extent for NT. Mean values of maximum chloride concentration were higher for CT than NT at 88 mm h-1, but not at the two lower intensities. Rainfall intensity had no effect on mean values of maximum chloride concentration for either CT or NT. Our results indicated that although preferential leaching occurred in these wet clay loam soils under relatively high rainfall intensities, the amount of chloride leached past 50 cm was minimal. Caution is advised in extrapolating these results to scenarios where conditions are different from this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Quality Research JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207