MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921107606 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.256

A257 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CELIAC DISEASE AND AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2019· review· en· W2921107606 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua Quan, Nicola Panaccione, James A. King, Fox E. Underwood, Joseph W. Windsor, Stephanie Coward, Dominica Gidrewicz, Gilaad G. Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutism spectrum disorderDiseaseComorbidityObservational studyPopulationCohort studyEpidemiologyMEDLINECohortAutismInternal medicinePsychiatryBiologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Celiac disease is a gastrointestinal disorder affecting approximately 1% of the population. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) describes a range of developmental disorders that affects communication and behavior with no known cause. Several epidemiological studies have explored a possible connection between celiac disease and ASD. To evaluate the association between celiac disease and ASD. A systematic review was performed. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for observational studies reporting the co-occurrence of celiac disease and ASD between January 1st, 1946 and May 2nd, 2018. Studies reporting the prevalence of ASD within a cohort of celiac disease patients or vice versa were included. Studies were assessed for quality, heterogeneity, and overall findings. Fifteen articles investigating the association between celiac disease and ASD were identified (Table 1); thirteen studies observed cohorts of ASD patients and four studies observed cohorts of celiac disease patients. There was significant heterogeneity between studies. Statistically significant results supporting the association between ASD and celiac disease were observed in three studies that had the largest sample sizes. However, the majority of studies demonstrating no association employed invalid or unclear sampling techniques, were at risk of selection bias, or included small sample sizes. This systematic review suggests there is limited evidence to support an association between ASD and celiac disease. However, several study design characteristics, rather than the non-existence of this comorbidity, may explain these findings. Further population-based studies are necessary to adequately assess the relationship between these two conditions. NR: not reported; N/A: not applicable (i.e., no control group) †diagnosis of ASD before celiac disease ^diagnosis of ASD after celiac disease NR: not reported; N/A: not applicable (i.e., no control group) †diagnosis of ASD before celiac disease ^diagnosis of ASD after celiac disease None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.008
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207