MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Excellent outcomes in bilateral testicular germ cell tumors over four decades.

2019· article· en· W2921119383 on OpenAlexaff
Ningning Lu, Aaron R. Hansen, Philippe L. Bédard, Padraig Warde, Joan Sweet, Robert J. Hamilton, Martin O’Malley, Peter Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSeminomaTesticular cancerStage (stratigraphy)HistologyOrchiectomySurgeryCancerMedian follow-upUrologyInternal medicineGastroenterologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

523 Background: Bilateral testicular germ cell tumours (BTC) form a small minority of testicular cancer and detailed management data are sparse. Methods: Bilateral testicular cancer (BTC) patients managed at a single cancer centre were retrospectively analyzed. Synchronous BTC was defined as uni+contralateral presentation within 3 months. Patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were collected. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Results: Between Jan 1971 to Jun 2018, 118 pts were included. Nine patients (7.6%) had cryptorchidism. Twenty-two patients (18.6%) had synchronous BTC at median age of 30(21-54) years, 11 presented with concordant histology (10-seminoma). Median follow-up time was 96(1-220) months. Two of 14 patients (14%) with stage I disease on surveillance had retroperitoneal nodal recurrence, other 3 (21%) had testicular recurrence after partial orchiectomy alone. No recurrence occurred for 8 stage II/III patients (36%) who received stage-appropriate treatment. All patients were alive without disease at last follow-up. For metachronous BTC, the median age was 27(16-68) and 37(19-78) years for first and second diagnosis, respectively. The median time interval was 88 (8-352) months, with shorter interval when second primary was non-seminoma, median 69 vs. 92 months. Concordant histology was present in 58 (38-seminoma) patients and discordant in 38 patients. There were 66, 23, 7 and 84, 9, 3 patients with stage I, II, III disease for first and second testicular cancer (TC), respectively. For all stage I disease, 69% of non-seminoma (n = 33) and 79% of seminoma (n = 81) were on surveillance, of whom the crude relapse rate was 15%. The median follow-up time after second diagnosis was 87 months. In all, 35 patients (30%) with recurrence except 1 were successfully salvaged. The 10-year OS and RFS for whole cohort was 99% and 69.8%, respectively. Conclusions: In our series, seminoma was the more common pathology, and management based on pathology and stage yielded excellent outcomes regardless of prior therapy. Metachronous BTC may occur at extremely long time intervals such that longer follow-up is needed to capture the majority of contralateral primary TC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207