Quality of Life but not Cognition is Impacted by Radiotherapy in Patients with Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) are benign neoplasms that are first treated by surgery and secondary radiation therapy in case of residual tumor or regrowth. The consequences of surgery and radiotherapy are still debated. The objective of the work was to assess the impact of surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and pituitary deficiencies on long term health-related quality of life (QoL) and cognitive function among NFPA patients. Forty-six NFPA patients were studied after 9.6±7.5 years follow-up using: i) the MoCA questionnaire to detect mild cognitive disabilities, ii) the McNair and Kahn scale to assess perceived cognitive impairment, iii) the HADS questionnaire to score anxiety and depression, and iv) the SF-36 and QLS-H questionnaires to assess QoL. All NFPA patients had surgery and 54% patients had radiation therapy (RT+). The MoCA score was abnormal in 41% NFPA patients. Neither the type of surgery nor radiotherapy influenced the prevalence of cognitive disabilities. The depression score was higher in RT+than RT- patients. Overall, no alteration in SF-36 and QLS-H QoL scales were observed in NFPA patients when compared with the French reference population. Among NFPA patients, mental composite score, general health and vitality scores were altered in RT+compared to RT- patients. The presence of multiple pituitary axis deficiencies worsened general health and vitality scale scoring. Consistent follow-up had a beneficial impact on psycho-emotional dimensions of health. Surgery and radiotherapy had no adverse effects on cognitive functions, however, QoL was altered in RT+patients. These latter alterations may be partly related to pituitary hormone deficiencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".