MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A retrospective observational study assessing bone metastases (mets) detection and management of patients (pts) with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in Canada.

2019· article· en· W2921196529 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fred Saad, Anil Kapoor, Armen Aprikian, Richard Casey, Michele Caveen, Maureen Reiner, Brad Gillesby, Antonio Finelli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortProstate cancerAndrogen deprivation therapyInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyOncologyGuidelineCancerPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

161 Background: Canadian Urological Association guidelines outline the scheduling of imaging modalities based on prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) to screen for mets in pts with nonmetastatic (M0) CRPC and to manage pts with metastatic (M1) CRPC. Data describing guideline adoption and real-world timing of bone scans and treatment patterns in Canadian CRPC pts are limited. Methods: A retrospective chart review conducted at 13 Canadian urology practices included pts with CRPC (PSA ≥2 ng/mL despite androgen deprivation therapy) sequentially identified in reverse chronological order starting July 30, 2015. Pts had no mets at CRPC diagnosis (index date). Data were abstracted from the index date to the chart review date. Coprimary objectives were to describe CRPC management in terms of timing of the 1st and repeat bone scans in M0 and treatment patterns when pts became metastatic. Secondary objectives described nonbone imaging. Results: 232 pts enrolled. Over the observation period 109 remained nonmetastatic (M0 cohort); 123 developed mets (M1 cohort). Median index PSADT was ~1.5x greater for the M0 cohort than the M1 cohort. 68 pts (71.6%) in M0 and 117 pts (95.1%) in M1 had ≥1 bone scan. Median (95% CI) months from CRPC diagnosis to 1st bone scan was 7.5 (5.6–9.6) for pts in M1 and 15.7 (10.0–23.0) for pts in M0. Median (95% CI) months from identification of mets to start of treatment for the M1 cohort was 3.2 (2.3–5.7). The most common therapies were abiraterone (55%) and enzalutamide (42%), with respective median (95% CI) durations of 12.7 (8.7–23.3) and 15.7 months (10.4–NE). 25% of pts received a bone-targeted agent. Conclusions: In CRPC, time to first bone scan was shorter for pts who subsequently developed mets or had rapid PSADT. Abiraterone and enzalutamide were the most common therapies in pts with mets. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→