MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921201287 · doi:10.1161/circ.139.suppl_1.045

Abstract 045: The Dose-Response Effect of a Mediterranean Style Diet With Lean Beef on Lipids and Lipoproteins

2019· article· en· W2921201287 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Fleming, Penny M. Kris‐Etherton, Kristina Petersen, David J. Baer

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsFleming College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMediterranean dietMedicineRed meatPolyunsaturated fatty acidBlood lipidsMediterranean climateLean meatFood scienceCrossover studyCholesterolAnimal scienceInternal medicineBiologyPlaceboFatty acidBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Mediterranean dietary pattern is widely recommended because of an extensive evidence base showing beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and mortality. The reduction in cardiovascular mortality is due, in part, to the improvements in lipids and lipoproteins versus a Western dietary pattern. Plant-based diets such as a Mediterranean diet are recommended for CVD risk reduction. However, adherence to plant-based diets is often hampered by the limited or restricted intake of red meat, a staple of the American diet. We conducted a multicenter, 4-period controlled feeding, randomized crossover study at Penn State University and USDA-Beltsville to evaluate the effects of a Mediterranean diet (CHO 42%, PRO 17%, FAT 41%, SFA 8%, MUFA 26%, PUFA 8%) with different quantities of lean beef (0.5, 2.5 and 5.5 oz/day) compared to an Average American diet (AAD; CHO 52%, PRO 15%, FAT 33%, SFA 12%, MUFA 13%, PUFA 8%) on CVD risk factors. We tested the hypothesis that including 0.5, 2.5 or 5.5 oz/d (based on 2100 kcals) of lean beef in a healthy Mediterranean style diet will confer similar cardioprotective benefits, and be superior to an AAD. Each Mediterranean diet included 7oz. equivalents of protein, of which 0.5, 2.5 or 5.5 oz. came from beef and the remainder from fish, poultry, pork, nuts, eggs, and legumes. The quantities of beef reflect amounts consumed in a traditional Mediterranean diet (0.5 oz.), current consumption in the U.S. (2.5 oz.), and an amount that represents all animal protein equivalents (5.5 oz.). Participants (n=60; 30 per site) included generally healthy normal to overweight/obese males and females (BMI= 20-38 kg/m 2 ) 30 to 60 years. Participants were randomized to each of the 4 diets for 4 weeks with an approximate 2-week break between treatments. Fasting blood samples were collected on two consecutive days at baseline (start of study) and at the end of each 4-week period. All three Mediterranean diets elicited similar lowering of total cholesterol (TC; p<0.0001), LDL-C (p<0.001), non-HDL-C (p<0.0001) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) (p<0.0001) that was greater than the AAD. All diets (AAD, MED0.5, MED2.5 and MED5.5) decreased HDL-C (-3.46 ± 1.11, -4.93 ± 1.14, -4.44 ± 0.93, and -3.31 ± 1.20 mg/dl, respectively; p<0.01) and apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) (-8.63 ± 1.77, -11.45 ± 1.72, -11.21 ± 1.71, and -7.97 ± 1.90 mg/dl, respectively; p<0.0001). The MED5.5 attenuated the reduction in apoA1 versus the other two MED diets (p<0.05). In conclusion, a healthy Mediterranean Style diet containing 0.5 to 5.5 oz/day of lean beef improves multiple CVD risk factors compared to a current American dietary pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→