MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Quality-of-care provided to prostate cancer (PC) patients for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis-induced by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): Results of a chart audit.

2013· article· en· W2921222181 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rehab Chahin, Henriette Breunis, Shabbir M.H. Alibhai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAndrogen deprivation therapyOsteoporosisVitamin D and neurologyReferralProstate cancerPhysical therapyFRAXvitamin D deficiencyBone mineralHip fractureInternal medicinePediatricsCancerFamily medicineOsteoporotic fracture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e20622 Background: Men with PC on ADT are at risk of developing decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis, frequently associated with increased risk of fractures and related consequences. Guidelines recommend referral to specialized clinics for bone health care, but the quality of care in osteoporosis clinics and benefits to patients has never been reported. Methods: Charts for 67 consecutive men (mean age 74.2 y) on ADT referred to the osteoporosis clinic at the Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada, between 2010 and 2011, were reviewed by a single reviewer using a structured data abstraction sheet. The following quality of care issues were examined: (a) bone health services provided to PC patients receiving ADT, i.e. screening, preventing, and treating osteoporosis; (b) use of Canadian guidelines and fracture risk assessment during ADT for targeting the appropriate therapy. Results: 56 (83.6%) were receiving continuous ADT and 11 (16.4%) intermittent for a mean duration of 27.4±30.7 months at the time of baseline visit. 19.4% had their first BMD before starting ADT and 50.7% during the first year. At initial consultation, 55.2% were taking <1000 mg calcium daily from all sources, while 26.9% were taking more than 1200 mg; 22.4% were taking Vitamin D ≥ 3 months, 81.8% of them had a blood level of Vitamin D ≥ 75 nmol/L. Based on a validated fracture risk assessment tool (CAROC), the 10-year fracture risk was moderate in 28 (41.8%) and high in 9 (13.4%). 71.4% of the patients with a sedentary lifestyle were advised to increase exercise or were referred to a formal exercise program. Of the 39 (70%) and 24 (39.2%) of patients who were not taking appropriate amounts of calcium and vitamin D, respectively, 100% were recommended to adjust their intake to guideline levels. All the patients with high fracture risk were recommended to take bisphosphonates. Conclusions: The osteoporosis clinic performed a comprehensive assessment and recommended guideline-based bone health care for the vast majority of men on ADT, suggesting a systematic approach to assessing bone health is associated with high rates of guideline-adherent care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBone health and osteoporosis research→French-language works237,207→