Post-harvest Evaluation of Bananas (Musa sp.) Cultivated in the Brazilian Semi-arid Region When Submitted to Cold Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluates the post-harvest quality of fruits of different banana cultivars regarding type of propagation when stored in cold at three different times at constant temperature. The experiment was carried out at the Fazenda Terra Santa in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. We applied a completely randomized experiment in a 6 × 3 factorial, evaluating the post-harvest development of ‘Prata-anã’ and ‘Pacovan’ cultivars, propagated in three different ways and analyzed at three distinct times of storage in the cold. The following fruit quality variables were analyzed: soluble solids, vitamin C content, titratable acidity, and potential of hydrogen (pH). The analysis of variance revealed a significant effect at 1% probability in all sources of variation of analyzed variables of Soluble Solids and pH, for the unfolding treatments × storage time of the analyzed variables Vitamin C and titratable acidity, and for the source of variation treatment of the vitamin C variable. The ‘Prata-anã’ cultivar propagated by rhizome with “ceva” was the most efficient technique of propagation, providing good soluble solids and titratable acidity contents, but with the lowest pH values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".