Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Lentil Crop Breeding Plots From Multi-Spectral Images Captured by UAV-Mounted Camera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) paired with image detection and segmentation techniques can be used to extract plant phenotype information of individual breeding or research plots. Each plot contains plants of a single genetic line. Breeders are interested in selecting lines with preferred phenotypes (physical traits) that increase crop yield or resilience. Automated detection and segmentation of plots would enable automatic monitoring and quantification of plot phenotypes, allowing a faster selection process that requires much fewer person-hours compared with manual assessment. A detection algorithm based on Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) blob detection and a segmentation algorithm based on a combination of unsupervised clustering and random walker image segmentation are proposed to detect and segment lentil plots from multi-spectral aerial images. Our algorithm detects and segments lentil plots from normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) images. The detection algorithm exhibited an average precision and recall of 96.3% and 97.2% respectively. The average Dice similarity coefficient between a detected segmented plot and its ground truth was 0.906.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".