MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921303866 · doi:10.29390/cjrt-2018-021

Assessing physical and respiratory distress in children with bronchiolitis admitted to a community hospital emergency department: A retrospective chart review

2019· article· en· W2921303866 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mika Nonoyama, Vinay Kukreti, Efrosini Papaconstantinou, R D’Cruz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Memorial Chiropractic CollegeLakeridge HealthUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoCentre for Disability Prevention and RehabilitationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchiolitisMedicineRespiratory distressEmergency departmentPediatricsRetrospective cohort studyPsychological interventionEmergency medicineCommunity hospitalRespiratory systemInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Bronchiolitis is a leading cause of infant hospitalization with wide variation in its diagnosis and management, especially in smaller community hospitals. The objective of this study is to describe children admitted to a community-based hospital emergency department (ED) for bronchiolitis and explore alternate assessments of illness severity. METHODS: < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: = 0.04, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of children admitted to a community-based ED for bronchiolitis received unnecessary CXR and medications. Assessing physical and respiratory distress may be more effective at determining illness severity compared with radiological or laboratory testing. Local clinical practice guidelines may aid in optimal management of bronchiolitis for community-based EDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Respiratory TherapySame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207