MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921315792 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3130

Probing hot gas around luminous red galaxies through the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect

2019· article· en· W2921315792 on OpenAlexafffund
H. Tanimura, G. Hinshaw, Ian G. McCarthy, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, Nabila Aghanim, Yin-Zhe Ma, Alexander Mead, Tilman Tröster, Alireza Hojjati, Bruno Moraes

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersEuropean Research CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationHigher Education Funding Council for EnglandCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeMax-Planck-GesellschaftScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsHaloSouth Pole TelescopeRedshiftVirial theoremGalaxySunyaev–Zel'dovich effectGalactic haloGalaxy clusterGravitational potentialAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We construct the mean thermal Sunyaev–Zel’dovich (tSZ) Comptonization y-profile around luminous red galaxies (LRGs) in the redshift range 0.16 < z < 0.47 from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 using the Planck y-map. We detect a significant tSZ signal out to ∼30 arcmin, which is well beyond the 10 arcmin angular resolution of the y-map and well beyond the virial radii of the LRGs. We compare the measured profile with predictions from the cosmo-OWLS suite of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. The best agreement is obtained for models that include efficient feedback from active galactic nuclei, over and above feedback associated with star formation. We also compare our results with predictions based on the halo model with a universal pressure profile giving the y-signal. The predicted profile is consistent with the data when using stacked weak lensing measurements to estimate the halo masses of the LRGs, but only if we account for the clustering of neighbouring haloes via a two-halo term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→