MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921316624 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.156

A157 FECAL MICROBIOTA TRANSPLANT FOR RECURRENT CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTION: A SINGLE CENTER PEDIATRIC EXPERIENCE

2019· article· en· W2921316624 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Burnett, Dina Kao, Joanne Yap, Justine Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridium difficileMedicineFecal bacteriotherapySingle CenterC difficileCecumFidaxomicinEnterocolitisAntibioticsCefuroximeGastroenterologyFecesSurgeryInternal medicineVancomycinMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has become an accepted therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI), with strong evidence for its high efficacy. Reports of FMT for rCDI have mostly focused on colonoscopic administration, with limited description of nasogastric (NG), nasojejunal (NJ) or gastric-tube (GT) delivery. We present results from our pediatric rCDI-FMT program, which primarily uses NG or GT administration. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of FMT for rCDI at Stollery Children’s Hospital since 2015. In all cases, Health Canada’s FMT guidance document was used to determine indication and potential contraindications for FMT, as well as screening processes for donors. An FMT protocol was developed that included bowel preparation, and was used in all cases. Total fecal slurry dose administered was 37.5-100g (1.3–2.9 g/kg). In total, 5 individual patients received FMT (total 7 procedures), including via NG (1), GT (4), NJ (1) and into cecum via colonscope (1). At time of first CDI, all patients were on either immune modulating medications (3/5), had a recent course of antibiotics (4/5), or both (2/5). Average age at first FMT was 9.0 years (5.2–13.9), with an average of 4 (3–6) toxin positive CDIs prior to first FMT, and 1.2 years (0.5–2.1) from first CDI to FMT. Following FMT, one day of abdominal pain and a single emesis were described in one patient, otherwise no short term complications were documented. Two CDI relapses occurred within 3 weeks of first FMT, requiring repeat FMT (1 NJ, 1 colonoscope). After FMT (including repeated FMT in 2/5 cases), we report all 5 patients (100%) had successfully eradicated CDI, defined as no rCDI within 12 weeks of FMT. With average follow up of 12 months (2.3–34.4), only the 2/5 cases that required a repeat FMT for early relapse have had further CDI, one spontaneously at 15 months and one following antibiotic exposure 4 months post second FMT. We describe FMT via the upper-GI route for 5 pediatric patients with rCDI, with no serious short term complications identified. The overall 100% success rate reported is higher than described elsewhere in the literature, although the small sample size is acknowledged. The upper GI route of FMT delivery has advantages for children, particularly those with an existing GT. However, additional work is required to determine the optimal route of delivery (upper vs lower GI), optimal dose (expressed in g/kg for pediatric patients) and whether bowel prep is required for FMT treatment of rCDI in children. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→