MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Boreal Forest Ecosystems

2017· other· en· W2921346813 on OpenAlexaff
Edward A. Johnson, Y. E. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Encyclopedia of Geography · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorealTaigaPeatGlacial periodHolocenePopulationEnvironmental sciencePleistocenePhysical geographyEcologyClimate changeEcosystemGeographyGeologyOceanographyForestryPaleontologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The boreal forest is circumpolar. It had to reinvade from the south several times during the Pleistocene because of continental glaciation. Even in the Holocene the forest composition changed several times. Therefore the boreal forest we see today is a melange of histories and conditions. Only the southern end of the boreal forest has been significantly impacted by intensive land use. Peatlands are common on both uplands and lowlands due to incomplete drainage. The ground and surface waters do not always flow as the surface topography would suggest. The boreal trees can be best understood by their population dynamics as influenced by wildfire and insect outbreak disturbances. Climate warming will have the largest impact on boreal ecosystems since the Pleistocene glaciation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Encyclopedia of GeographySame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207