MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921368798 · doi:10.1039/c9nr01306g

Potentiating photodynamic therapy of ICG-loaded nanoparticles by depleting GSH with PEITC

2019· article· en· W2921368798 on OpenAlexaff
Hang Hu, Jitang Chen, Hai Yang, Xuetao Huang, Honglian Wu, Yuxin Wu, Fenfang Li, Yunfei Yi, Chen Xiao, Yihui Li, Yuxiang Tang, Zifu Li, Bixiang Zhang, Xiangliang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotodynamic therapyPhenethyl isothiocyanateNanoparticleIndocyanine greenCancer researchChemistryMaterials scienceNanotechnologyMedicineCancerPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved cancer treatment which utilizes reactive oxygen species (ROS) to eradicate cancer cells. But the high concentration of GSH inside tumor cells can neutralize the generated ROS during PDT, resulting in an insufficient therapeutic effect. To address this issue, we combined ICG-loaded nanoparticles with PEITC for potent PDT. ICG encapsulated in novel hydroxyethyl starch-oleic acid conjugate (HES-OA) nanoparticles (∼50 nm) exhibited excellent stability and efficient singlet oxygen generation under laser irradiation, promoted cellular uptake, and enhanced tumor accumulation, whilst PEITC depleted intracellular GSH significantly. As a result, PDT based on ICG-loaded NPs combined with PEITC synergistically suppressed cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Potentiating ICG-loaded NPs with PEITC represents a novel and efficient strategy to enhance PDT efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations112
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207