MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Incidental Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease from the British Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: Follow-Up Data from the First Reported Cohort

2012· article· en· W2921407160 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rhys O. Butcher, Catriona Boyd, Regi George, Roger Prudham, Atta M. Abbasi, Jimmy K. Limdi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticInflammatory bowel diseaseUlcerative colitisColonoscopyCohortInternal medicineColorectal cancerDiseaseCrohn's diseaseCancerGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: There is limited data on asymptomatic individuals incidentally diagnosed to have Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) screens individuals aged 60-69 years with a Faecal Occult Blood test (FOBt) followed by a screening colonoscopy if FOBt positive. We reported at ACG 2011, the incidental diagnosis of IBD through BCSP at our centre between April 2008 and April 2011. The aim of this study was to characterize patient outcome in this cohort. Methods: We conducted an up-to-date case note and electronic patient record review of all patients diagnosed incidentally with IBD through BCSP with follow-up data as available until 30th April 2012. Clinical data including demographics, disease characteristics, previous and current therapies and outcomes were evaluated. Results: Of 121,350 patients invited, 59,056 were screened (Females 31,136), an uptake of 48.67% and FOBt positivity of 2.10%. Colonoscopy was performed in 1240 patients. Thirteen patients had an incidental diagnosis of IBD. Three of 13 cases were female, and the median age at diagnosis was 65. Five patients had Crohn's disease (CD), 6 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 2 had IBD-type unclassified (IBDU). Seven patients (53.8%) were asymptomatic at diagnosis. Mean values for blood parameters at diagnosis were Hb 13.8, Platelets 290, Albumin 40 and CRP 7.4. Twelve patients had follow-up data available, one asymptomatic patient died of an unrelated cause prior to clinic review. The mean follow-up period was 37.8 months (range 21-45 months). Three (50.0%) of the asymptomatic patients reviewed became symptomatic during the follow-up period. Progression of disease as determined by the Montreal classification occurred in 2 patients with change from colonic to ileo-colonic CD by 11 months and left-sided to extensive UC by 24 months. Treatment included steroids (7), 5-ASA (11), immunomodulators (azathioprine 4; methotrexate 1) and anti-TNF (infliximab 2). None required surgery. In those requiring escalation of therapy (33.3%) the median time to immunomodulation was 27 months (range 5-30 months). Mean CRP at diagnosis was 9.7 in those that progressed to immunomodulator and 6.2 in all other patients. Those requiring immunomodulators and/or anti-TNF (male 4) had asymptomatic extensive UC, symptomatic left-sided UC, symptomatic left-sided IBDU and symptomatic non-stricturing, non-penetrating Crohn's colitis at diagnosis. Conclusion: Incidental diagnosis of IBD is not an uncommon phenomenon and these patients may present an important model for study of early disease. A proportion of this cohort of initially asymptomatic patients appear to demonstrate disease progression with a rapid requirement of immunomodulator and/or anti-TNF therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→