MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921420335 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.283

A284 ROLE OF KRT15+ STEM CELLS IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

2019· article· en· W2921420335 on OpenAlexaffabout
J Douchin, Véronique Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer stem cellEsophageal cancerStem cellEsophagusCancer researchMedicinePopulationCancerCarcinomaPathologyOncologyInternal medicineBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, patients with esophageal cancer have a 5-year survival rate of only 14%, the 2nd worst in 2017. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common esophageal cancer worldwide. Risk factors include tobacco smoking, alcohol use and esophagitis. Esophagitis is developed upon several insults (e.g. acid/bile reflux, radiation, infection). Epithelial damages typically trigger activation of stem cells which will orchestrate tissue regeneration. The existence of esophageal stem cells remained controversial until our studies. We recently identified that Krt15 promotor marks a subpopulation of esophageal basal cells which display self-renewal and multipotent capacities, characteristics consistent with a stem cell population. Our preliminary results suggest that Krt15 esophageal cells have tumor-initiating capacities in mouse. However, we still ignore the role of these cells at later stages of the disease. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been linked to treatment resistance and poor survival rate. Therefore, the characterization of esophageal CSCs is a promising strategy to improve survival and treatment in ESCC patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of Krt15+ esophageal cancer cells in cancer initiation, progression and relapse. We hypothesize that Krt15+ cells initiate tumor formation and contribute to the establishment of treatment resistance in ESCC patients. The carcinogen 4-nitroquinoline 1-ozide (4NQO) is used to induce oral-esophageal lesions in mouse that morphologically resemble human ESCC. Krt15-CrePR1;Rosa26mTomato/mGFP mice are treated with 4-NQO in the drinking water and expansion of Krt15+ (GFP-labeled) cells was measured. To determine the role of Krt15+ cells in esophageal tumor initiation, we treated Krt15-CrePR1;Rosa26mTomato/mGFP mice with 4-NQO. We observed that Krt15+ cells expand in the esophageal lesions. The clones formed by Krt15+ cells (GFP-labeled) were bigger in mice treated with 4-NQO than in control mice suggesting that Krt15+ cells contribute to ESCC expansion. Interestingly, in human ESCC tumors, we observed that K15 expression is localized at the tumor migration edges suggesting a role for K15 in migration and invasion. Furthermore, we isolated esophageal tumors from WT mice treated with 4-NQO. We observed that K15 expression is also increased in the invasive front of mouse esophageal tumors. Finally, we quantified the expression of Krt15 transcript in mouse ESCC cell lines which harbor variable tumorigenicity and aggressiveness. We observed that Krt15 expression correlated with the aggressiveness of ESCC mouse cell lines. Our results support that Krt15+ stem cells play a role in ESCC initiation and progression suggesting that targeting these stem cells might be a therapeutic approach to improve survival of ESCC patients. Start-up funding (Université de Sherbrooke and CRCHUS)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207