MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921437996 · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2019.2900996

Fronthaul Compression and Precoding Design for Full-Duplex Cloud Radio Access Network

2019· article· en· W2921437996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Systems Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPrecodingTelecommunications linkComputer scienceMathematical optimizationRadio access networkConvex optimizationMaximizationQuantization (signal processing)Zero-forcing precodingAlgorithmMathematicsMIMOComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)Base stationRegular polygon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, joint design of fronthaul compression and precoding is studied for full-duplex (FD) cloud radio access networks. Multiple uplink and downlink users equipped with multiple antennas communicate with a control unit (CU) in the “cloud” through a set of multiantenna FD radio units that are connected to the CU through limited capacity fronthaul links. In the first part of this paper, we address the weighted sum-rate maximization problem, to compute the optimal precoding and the quantization noise covariance matrices. By exploiting the relationship between weighted-sum-rate maximization and weighted minimum-mean-square-error minimization problems, and leveraging the successive convex approximation (SCA) method, we propose an iterative algorithm that guarantees convergence to a stationary point. In the second part of this paper, we address the stochastic sum-rate maximization problem under fast-fading channels, where only the statistics of the channel state information is available. Casting this nonconvex problem as a difference of convex problem, an iterative algorithm based on the combination of stochastic successive upper bound minimization and SCA approaches that guarantees convergence to a stationary point is proposed. Numerical results demonstrate the advantage of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it