MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921549065 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.017

A18 STRESS TRIGGERS LOSS OF TOLERANCE TO FOOD ANTIGEN CAUSING HISTAMINE MEDIATED NEURON HYPEREXCITABILITY IN A PRECLINICAL MODEL OF IBS.

2019· article· en· W2921549065 on OpenAlexaff
Cintya D. Lopez Lopez, Josue O. Jaramillo Polanco, Yang Yu, S Vanner, M. Cecilia Berin, David E. Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistamineOvalbuminAntigenSensitizationImmune systemImmunologyMast cellMedicineEndocrinologyChemistryInternal medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food is a common trigger of IBS symptoms but the etiology is unclear. Increased levels of immune mediators that sensitize nerves (e.g. histamine) have been reported in IBS patients. While systemic food allergy is not a feature of IBS, it is unknown if loss of tolerance to an antigen promotes a local rather than a systemic response to the antigen. Previously we showed that short term exposure to stress and food antigen increased excitability of neurons. However, it is unknown whether stress can enable a bystander food antigen to increase neuron excitability following re-exposure to the antigen. Determine whether exposure to stress and food antigen enables release of colonic immune mediators that excite nociceptive neurons upon re-exposure to antigen. BALB/c mice were exposed to water avoidance stress (WAS) or sham stress for 1 hr daily for 10 days. On day 2–10, mice were exposed to ovalbumin (OVA) or saline (SAL). Four weeks later, mice were re-exposed to either OVA or SAL yielding 4 groups: WAS/OVA+OVA, WAS/OVA+SAL, WAS/SAL+OVA, and Sham/OVA+OVA. Mice were euthanized and a segment of colon incubated in media for 4 hrs and supernatants collected; an adjacent segment of colon was stained for mast cells by both toluidine blue and mast cell tryptase; serum was also obtained. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons from control mice were incubated with colonic supernatants and excitability was assessed by measuring rheobase (minimal current to elicit an action potential) using perforated patch clamp technique. Some DRG neurons were pre-incubated with the histamine H1 receptor antagonist pyrilamine (1 µM) 1 hr prior to supernatant addition. Mast cells numbers were assessed blindly in nonadjacent sections. Total serum IgE was measured by ELISA. Data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post test. Supernatants from WAS/OVA+OVA mice decreased the rheobase of DRG neurons compared to the WAS/OVA+SAL, WAS/SAL+OVA and Sham/OVA+OVA supernatants (75 ± 4.9 pA vs 93 ± 5.2, 94.5 ± 5.0, 94 ± 5.0 pA, respectively; p<0.05). This hyperexcitability was blocked by pyrilamine (75 ± 4.9 vs 97±5.7 pA; p<0.01). Both toluidine blue and tryptase staining showed an increase in the number of mast cells in colons from WAS/OVA+OVA compared to Sham/OVA+OVA mice (p <0.05). Total levels of IgE in the serum were not different amongst the groups. These data suggest that exposure to a bystander food antigen in presence of stress can sensitize colonic immune cells such that re-exposure to the antigen triggers release of mediators such as histamine able to sensitize nociceptive neurons. The increase in colonic mast cells suggests mast cells may be a source of these mediators. However, unaltered serum IgE suggests a local rather than a systemic sensitization. Queen’s University, Department of Medicine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→