MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Keynote 057: Phase II trial of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for patients (pts) with high-risk (HR) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) unresponsive to bacillus calmette-guérin (BCG).

2019· article· en· W2921560039 on OpenAlexaff
Arjun Vasant Balar, Girish S. Kulkarni, Edward Uchio, Joost L. Boormans, Loı̈c Mourey, Laurence E. Krieger, Eric A. Singer, Dean F. Bajorin, Ashish M. Kamat, Petros Grivas, Ho Kyung Seo, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Badrinath R. Konety, Kijoeng Nam, Ekta Kapadia, Tara L. Frenkl, Ronald de Wit

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBladder cancerCohortPembrolizumabCystectomyInternal medicineClinical endpointUrologyCancerCarcinoma in situDiscontinuationSurgeryOncologyClinical trialImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

350 Background: The PD-1 inhibitor pembro has durable antitumor activity in pts with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Upregulation of the PD-1 pathway has been observed in BCG-resistant NMIBC, suggesting pembro may benefit. Efficacy and safety of pembro in pts with HR, BCG-unresponsive NMIBC was evaluated in the single-arm phase 2 KEYNOTE-057 study; updated results for pts with carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumor (cohort A) are reported. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed HR, BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without papillary disease, who received adequate BCG therapy and were unable/unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy received pembro 200 mg Q3W for 24 mo or until recurrence, progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Pts with HR NMIBC or progressive disease during treatment were required to discontinue. Primary end point: complete response rate (CRR); key secondary end points: duration of response and safety. Results: 103 pts (median age 73 years; CIS alone 71.8%; median number of prior BCG instillations 12) have enrolled in cohort A. 3-mo CRR rate was 38.8% (95% CI 29.4%-48.9%) by central assessment. Among 40 pts who achieved CR at 3 mo, 72.5% maintained CR at last follow-up (median 14.0 mo; range 4.0-26.3) and median CR duration has not been reached (range 0+ to 14.1+ mo). 80.2% of pts had a CR duration of ≥6 mo (Kaplan-Meier method). 10 (25.0%) experienced recurrent NMIBC after CR; at the time of analysis, none progressed to muscle invasive or metastatic disease. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 65 (63.1%) pts; most frequent were pruritus (10.7%), fatigue (9.7%), diarrhea (8.7%), hypothyroidism (5.8%), and maculopapular rash (5.8%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 13 (12.6%) pts; 1 death was considered treatment-related (colitis in patient inadequately treated with steroids). Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 19 (18.4%) pts. Conclusions: Pembro had encouraging activity in pts with HR, BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without papillary tumors and a safety profile consistent with that of previous experience. Updated data using additional follow-up will be presented. Clinical trial. Clinical trial information: NCT02625961.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations113
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207