High‐Performance Li–SeS<i><sub>x</sub></i> All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract All‐solid‐state Li–S batteries are promising candidates for next‐generation energy‐storage systems considering their high energy density and high safety. However, their development is hindered by the sluggish electrochemical kinetics and low S utilization due to high interfacial resistance and the electronic insulating nature of S. Herein, Se is introduced into S cathodes by forming SeS x solid solutions to modify the electronic and ionic conductivities and ultimately enhance cathode utilization in all‐solid‐state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). Theoretical calculations confirm the redistribution of electron densities after introducing Se. The interfacial ionic conductivities of all achieved SeS x –Li 3 PS 4 ( x = 3, 2, 1, and 0.33) composites are 10 −6 S cm −1 . Stable and highly reversible SeS x cathodes for sulfide‐based ASSLBs can be developed. Surprisingly, the SeS 2 /Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 –Li 3 PS 4 /Li solid‐state cells exhibit excellent performance and deliver a high capacity over 1100 mAh g −1 (98.5% of its theoretical capacity) at 50 mA g −1 and remained highly stable for 100 cycles. Moreover, high loading cells can achieve high areal capacities up to 12.6 mAh cm −2 . This research deepens the understanding of Se–S solid solution chemistry in ASSLB systems and offers a new strategy to achieve high‐performance S‐based cathodes for application in ASSLBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".