MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921619216 · doi:10.1109/siva.2018.8660985

Compressive Sensing-Based Underground Channel Estimation Operating in Millimetter-Wave Band

2018· article· en· W2921619216 on OpenAlexaff
Widad Belaoura, Khalida Ghanem, Mourad Nedil, Hicham Bousbia-Salah, Rym Labdaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Compressed sensingMIMOComputer scienceEstimatorBenchmark (surveying)Bit error rateExtremely high frequencyElectronic engineeringFrame (networking)TelecommunicationsEngineeringAlgorithmGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Propagation in underground mine environment, especially for millimeter-Wave (mm-Wave) band is envisioned as one of the most challenging communication systems. An efficient channel estimation is made critical for 60 GHz communications, because this, high-resolution step can significantly enhance the stability and the data rates of the communication system. This paper investigates a promising compressed sensing (CS) based underground channel estimation scheme in time domain for 2 x 2 multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) system operating in the 60 GHz band. Motivated by the observation that the mm-Wave channel is prone to exhibit sparsity, this architecture is applied on channel measurements which are performed in real MIMO underground mine environments, by skillfully designing the pilots within the frame. This work is considered to be the first investigation that estimated the underground radio channel based on real-world propagation measurements at this band. We have retained the conventional least squares (LS) as the benchmark to show that the CS estimator technique achieves a higher estimation accuracy than the former in terms of both the normalized mean square error (NMSE) and the bit error rate (BER).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207