MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921677027 · doi:10.1109/icce.2019.8662120

An Entropy-Based Inverse Tone Mapping Operator with Improved Color Accuracy for High Dynamic Range Applications

2019· article· en· W2921677027 on OpenAlexaff
Pedram Mohammadi, Maryam Hashemi, Mahsa T. Pourazad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGamutTone mappingHigh dynamic rangeHigh-dynamic-range imagingComputer scienceComputer visionBrightnessColor spaceDynamic rangeArtificial intelligenceLuminanceInverseRange (aeronautics)Color correctionEntropy (arrow of time)Computer graphics (images)MathematicsImage (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conversion of existing image and video content to High Dynamic Range (HDR) using inverse Tone Mapping Operators (iTMOs) is expected to open new market opportunities for studios and content owners. One of the issues facing iTMOs arises from the fact that changing the input Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) luminance to HDR results in color shifts, regardless of the color space or gamut that the operation takes place, requiring the use of an efficient color restoration method. Therefore, maintaining the color accuracy between the input SDR and output HDR content is of high importance in designing iTMOs. In this paper, we propose an iTMO capable of maintaining the color accuracy between the original SDR and the resulting HDR output, while at the same time providing a good balance between the overall brightness and contrast in the HDR content. The results of our subjective evaluation demonstrate that the colors of the generated HDR content closely match those of the original SDR input, outperforming the existing state-of-the-art iTMOs and making the resulting HDR look natural and more appealing to the viewers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207