MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical validation of circulating cytokines as markers of prognosis and response to docetaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2019· article· en· W2921680685 on OpenAlexaff
Kate Mahon, Hui‐Ming Lin, Michelle Lee-Ng, Martin R. Stockler, Howard Gurney, Girish Mallesara, Karen Briscoe, Gavin Marx, Celestia S. Higano, Johann S. de Bono, Kim N., David A. Brown, Samuel N. Breit, Lisa G. Horvath

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocetaxelMedicineGDF15OncologyProstate cancerInternal medicineCohortProportional hazards modelChemotherapyCancerCytokineBiomarker

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

230 Background: Elevated circulating macrophage inhibitory cytokine -1 /growth differentiation factor 15 (MIC-1/GDF15), interleukins 4 (IL4) and 6 (IL6) levels were associated with poor prognosis and resistance to docetaxel chemotherapy in an exploratory cohort of men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To establish level 2 evidence of biomarker utility, these cytokines were tested in internal and external validation cohorts. Methods: Internal validation cohort: Plasma samples taken at baseline (BL) and preC2 docetaxel (n = 120). MIC-1/GDF15, IL-4 and IL-6 measured by ELISA assay. External validation cohort: Serum samples taken at BL and/or preC3 docetaxel in 430 men with mCRPC on phase III SYNERGY study (docetaxel +/- custirsen as 1 st line chemotherapy in mCRPC with no OS benefit in the experimental arm). MIC-1/GDF15 measured by ELISA assay. Associations between cytokine levels, PSA response, time to PSA progression and OS were assessed by non-parametric tests and Cox Regression survival analyses. Results: Internal validation: At a median follow-up of 14 months, higher MIC-1/GDF15 levels at BL and preC2 were associated with shorter OS (BL; HR 1.2 95%CI 1.0-1.4; p = 0.03 and preC2; HR 1.3 95%CI 1.1-1.5; p = 0.004). Increase in MIC-1/GDF15 after chemotherapy correlated with lack of PSA response (p < 0.001). IL4 and IL6 did not correlate with survival or demonstrate additional value. External validation: At a median follow-up of 23 months, higher MIC-1/GDF15 levels at BL and preC3 predicted shorter OS (BL; HR 1.4 95%CI 1.2-1.6; p < 0.0001 and preC3; HR 1.6 95%CI 1.3-1.8; p < 0.0001). Higher pre C3 MIC-1/GDF15 levels were also associated with shorter time to PSA progression (HR 1.2 95% CI 1.0-1.4; p = 0.02). Rise in MIC-1/GDF15 from BL to preC3 correlated with lack of 50% PSA fall at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Adherence to a biomarker development pipeline provides level 2 evidence of the prognostic value of circulating MIC-1/GDF15 in men with mCRPC receiving docetaxel. A prospective biomarker led study is now necessary to establish clinical utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicGDF15 and Related BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207