MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real World Analysis of Symptoms, Diagnostic Patterns, and Provider Perspective on Acute Hepatic Porphyrias

2018· article· en· W2921708717 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John J. Ko, Sarah Murray, Madeline Merkel, Chitra Karki, Katherine Krautwurst, Renata Mustafina, Sonalee Agarwal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPorphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute intermittent porphyriaPorphyriaAbdominal painNauseaVomitingMedical historyPorphobilinogenInternal medicineDemographicsPopulationPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute hepatic porphyrias (AHPs) are rare genetic diseases caused by mutations of enzymes involved in hepatic heme synthesis. Neurotoxic heme intermediates, aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and porphobilinogen (PBG), accumulate and can cause potentially life-threatening attacks and chronic symptoms. The study objective was to understand physician experiences diagnosing AHPs and to characterize the AHP patient population in a real-world setting. Methods: Physicians (n=175) from the US (29%), EU-5 (57%), Canada (9%), and Japan (6%) who actively managed or treated AHP patients (with and without recurrent attacks) in the year prior were recruited from 9/2017-10/2017 to complete an online survey collecting information on demographics, familiarity with AHPs and diagnostic tests, perspective on symptoms important to diagnosis, referral patterns, and treatment preferences. Subsequently, physicians reviewed 1-4 of their AHP patients' charts (n=546; 32% US), sharing data on anonymized patient demographics, medical history, number of porphyria attacks, and symptoms. Results: Physicians had a mean of 18 years of experience, 51% worked in academic settings, and the most common specialty was gastroenterology (25%). Symptoms considered informative for AHP diagnosis included abdominal pain (88%), red/dark urine (75%), muscle weakness (63%), vomiting (62%), fatigue (59%), and nausea (57%). AHP diagnostic tests considered informative included ALA in urine (73%) and PBG in urine (68%); however, other nonspecific tests were also commonly considered informative. Among charts reviewed, patients' mean age was 40 years, 53% were female, and 82% had acute intermittent porphyria (AIP). Initially, 26% of AHPs were misdiagnosed and 31% were diagnosed correctly (43% did not know this information). Most common misdiagnoses were nonspecific abdominal pain (32%), irritable bowel syndrome (27%), depression (25%), and fibromyalgia (25%). Patients had a mean of 1.8 attacks and 1.1 hospitalizations in the past year. Most common chronic symptoms reported between attacks were abdominal pain (50%), fatigue (36%), and nausea (32%). Conclusion: This research revealed there may be underdiagnoses or misdiagnoses due to common symptomology associated with AHPs and/or lack of understanding of appropriate laboratory and genetic testing procedures. Among patients diagnosed with AHPs, both acute attacks as well as chronic symptoms were reported indicating AHPs have both acute and chronic manifestations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicPorphyrin Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207