27 A New Method for Initiating Treatment with the Long-acting Antipsychotic Aripiprazole Lauroxil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract STUDY OBJECTIVE Slow release is a fundamental feature of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. This property allows continuous drug exposure between dosing intervals. However, there can be a significant delay between giving the first LAI dose and achievement of efficacious plasma concentrations. This time period requires additional pharmacologic intervention. Until now, this delay was addressed with one of two strategies: 1) continuing with supplemental oral antipsychotic, or 2) giving more LAI up front (e.g. loading dose). A third strategy has now been developed to reduce the time needed for oral supplementation when starting the LAI aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) from 21days to 1day. A nano-crystalline milled dispersion of AL (ALNCD; brand name ARISTADA INITIO™) was formulated by reducing the AL particle diameter from micron-size particles to nanometer- sized particles. ALNCD has faster dissolution and a shorter half-life than AL and is designed to be used as a single injection along with a single oral aripiprazole dose of 30mg as a 1-day alternative to the 21days of oral aripiprazole supplementation. Here we provide an overview of the new 1-day initiation regimen for starting AL treatment, and demonstrate the relative contributions of each of its components. METHODS A blinded, randomized, phase 1, pharmacokinetic (PK), and safety study compared the 1-day initiation regimen with the 21-day oral aripiprazole regimen. A combination of observed data, and population pharmacokinetic model–based simulations were used to plot plasma aripiprazole concentrations of single doses of ALNCD, 30mg oral aripiprazole, and AL, individually, and all three combined. RESULTS The PK profiles of the 1-day and 21-day initiation regimens (both in conjunction with either 441mg or 882mg doses of AL) were comparable, with therapeutically relevant aripiprazole levels achieved within 4days of treatment initiation. The safety profile of the 1-day initiation regimen was similar to the 21-day initiation regimen, and consistent with that of AL. Aripiprazole concentration–time profiles demonstrated that each component delivered aripiprazole to the systemic circulation at different time periods, with the 30mg dose of oral aripiprazole predominant in the first week, followed by ALNCD, and then AL. CONCLUSIONS The 1-day initiation regimen is well-tolerated and a suitable alternative to 21days of oral aripiprazole supplementation for starting AL. Each component of the 1-day initiation regimen, together with AL, is necessary to provide continuous coverage from treatment initiation until the next regularly scheduled AL injection. Funding Acknowledgements: This study was funded by Alkermes Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".