A67 ANTIBODY-MEDIATED REJECTION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION: A CASE SERIES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is being increasingly recognized after liver transplantation (LT). Nevertheless, its diagnosis is often delayed and its management remains an area of uncertainty. Review and describe all cases of humoral rejection after liver transplantation at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM). This was a case series of all adults diagnosed with AMR after LT at the CHUM in Montreal, Canada. Through a retrospective chart review, we examined the demographic characteristics of patients, the diagnostic process leading to identification of the cases, including donor specific antibodies (DSA) as well as histological findings, and the management of AMR, short and long term clinical outcomes and survival. Four cases (1.9%) of AMR were identified among 211 LT between January 2015 and March 2018. Median age was 59 years and all cases were men. Baseline liver disease included one case of cirrhosis from hepatitis C, B and D, one case of NASH cirrhosis and two cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. One patient had a retransplantation for chronic rejection. Median time from LT to diagnosis of AMR was 226 days (25–1060 days). class II DSAs were present in all four patients with a median mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 2187 (IQR 1279–5163) and two patients had a MFI >10,000. All 4 patients had at least one liver biopsy showing features of microvascular injury: portal endothelial cell hypertrophy (4/4 cases), microvasculitis (1/4 case), centrilobular sinusoidal disruption and congestion (2/4 cases). There was severe bile duct damage with cholestasis in all cases. Features of acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) were also seen in all cases in the early stage of the disease and subsided with treatment of TCMR. Two cases had features of chronic AMR. Focal C4d endothelial staining by immunofluorescence technique were seen in 1/3 liver samples. Treatment of AMR, following a course of corticosteroids, included intravenous immunoglobulins (4/4 cases), plasmapheresis (3/4 cases) and anti-thymoglobulins (2/4 cases). Median observation time was 646 days (275–1046 days). Two patients developed complications following treatment of AMR including bacteremia, cytomegalovirus reactivation, esophageal candidiasis, pulmonary aspergillosis, disseminated cryptococcosis with meningitis and lung adenocarcinoma. One patient died from pulmonary aspergillosis. AMR after LT is a rare and possibly underdiagnosed condition. It should be suspected in any patients with steroid-refractory rejection, especially in the presence of class II DSA. Although potentially associated with long term infectious and malignant complications, early treatment of AMR could prevent graft loss. None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".