MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921787201 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.002

A3 A PROOF-OF-CONCEPT, PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL OF THE GI SAFETY OF A HYDROGEN SULFIDE-RELEASING ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUG (ATB-346)

2019· article· en· W2921787201 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Wallace, Péter Nagy, Troy Feener, Thibault Allain, Tamás Ditrói, David Vaughan, Marcelo N. Muscará, Gilberto De Nucci, André G. Buret

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaproxenMedicineCelecoxibPlaceboOsteoarthritisNaproxen SodiumPharmacologyGastroenterologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a naturally occurring mediator produced by intestinal bacteria and various eukaryotic cells, which can exert protective and analgesic effects. ATB-346 is a H2S-releasing derivative of naproxen. In animals, ATB-346 produces negligible gastrointestinal (GI) damage and bleeding. In humans, ATB-346 was found to be much more potent and long-acting than naproxen. A human efficacy study demonstrated that ATB-346 (250 mg daily) was effective at significantly reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, and inhibiting systemic cyclo-oxygenase (COX) activity. COX is the targe enzyme of all NSAIDs. The aim of the present study was to determine if ATB-346 (250 mg once daily) would induce significantly less upper GI ulceration than standard dose sodium naproxen (550 mg twice daily). To determine if healthy subjects taking ATB-346 (250 mg once daily) for 14 days would develop significantly less gastroduodenal ulcers (3mm diameter with unequivocal depth) than subjects taking equi-effective anti-inflammatory doses of naproxen (550 mg twice daily). This was a double-blind, active control study. 244 healthy volunteers completed the study. Upper GI endoscopy was performed prior to and on day 14 after commencing treatment with naproxen (550 mg twice daily) or ATB-346 (250 mg once daily in the morning and placebo once daily in the evening). Whole blood thromboxane synthesis (COX activity) was measured on days 0, 7 and 14. For the primary endpoint, incidence of ulcers more than 3 mm in diameter, 53 subjects (42%) taking naproxen developed at least one ulcer, while only 3 subjects (2.5%) taking ATB-346 developed at least one ulcer (p=0.00001). The two drugs produced comparable suppression of systemic COX activity. Subjects in the naproxen group developed more ulcers (an average of 4/subject) than in the ATB-346 group (an average of 1.3/subject), and a greater incidence of larger (more than 5 mm diameter) ulcers (125 vs 0, respectively; see figure). The incidence of abdominal pain, gastro-esophageal reflux and nausea were markedly lower with ATB-346 than with naproxen. Systemic COX activity was inhibited by 95% in both the ATB-346 and naproxen groups (no significant difference) and plasma H2S levels were significantly elevated in subjects treated with ATB-346 (by 50%; p=0.001). As in pre-clinical studies, this phase 2 clinical trial demonstrated a dramatic increase in the GI safety of ATB-346 versus one of the most widely used NSAIDs, naproxen. ATB-346 produced equivalent suppression of COX to naproxen, consistent with a previous Phase 2A trial that demonstrated significant pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis. ATB-346 appears to be an effective and much safer alternative to existing NSAIDs. CIHRAntibe Therapeutics Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207