MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921812725

Standardization and Validation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in the Moroccan Population

2019· article· en· W2921812725 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abdelhak Azdad, Maria Benabdljlil, Khadija Al Zemmouri, Mostafa El Alaoui Faris

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Brain and Cognitive Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentNormativeCognitionPopulationStandardizationNeuropsychologyTest (biology)MedicinePsychologyGerontologyNeuropsychological assessmentCognitive impairmentClinical psychologyPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a cognitive screening test designed to assist health professionals in the detection of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Objectives: The aim of our work was to perform the adaptation and standardization of the MoCA in the Moroccan population, taking into account its different demographic characteristics, i.e., age, gender and education level. The second aim was to evaluate the predictive validity of the test in Moroccan patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Patients and Methods / Material and Methods: First we administered the MoCA-ma to 120 normal participants (60 men and 60 women). All the participants can read and speak Arabic, they had no neurological, neuropsychological, psychiatric or toxic history and they had a preserved cognitive functioning. Subjects were categorized according to age and educational level. Secondly, we administered the MoCA-ma and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-ma) to 40 healthy controls and 40 subjects fulfilling diagnostic criteria for AD. All the patients diagnosed as having AD underwent complete neurologic and somatic clinical examination, usual laboratory testing and MRI. Results: The MoCA-ma norms were established considering significant influential factors. Indeed, the normative data in this version have shown that performance of normal participants depend mainly on age and level of education while gender had no significant influence. The results of validation showed that the MoCA-ma was sensitive enough to detect cognitive impairment in subjects with AD. Conclusion: The standardization and validation of the Arabic version of the MoCA-ma provides to physicians an useful brief cognitive screening tool for the detection of AD in the Arabic countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Brain and Cognitive Sciences→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→