MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921823375 · doi:10.3198/jpr2018.06.0037crmp

Registration of the S2MET Barley Mapping Population for Multi‐Environment Genomewide Selection

2019· article· en· W2921823375 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plant Registrations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersMinnesota Department of AgricultureU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsHordeum vulgareBiologySelection (genetic algorithm)CultivarPopulationGenomic selectionBiotechnologyTriticeaeGermplasmAgronomyGenotypeGeneticsGenomePoaceaeComputer scienceSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Market changes in the malting and brewing industries have increased the demand for locally produced barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) in many regions across North America. Breeding for productive barley cultivars in diverse growing environments is complicated by genotype × environment interactions (GEIs), which can make selection for broad adaptation difficult but may be exploited to select optimal cultivars for each environment. Genomewide selection has recently become a useful tool to make efficient selections on individuals using genomewide marker data. To support the use of genomewide selection to breed locally adapted barley cultivars, the University of Minnesota barley breeding program is publicly releasing a panel of two‐row barley lines, and accompanying data, called the S2MET (Spring Two‐Row Multi‐Environment Trial) (Reg. No. MP‐2, NSL 526938 MAP). The S2MET includes 233 breeding lines grouped into a 183‐line training population and a 50‐line validation population. The entire panel was genotyped using genotyping‐by‐sequencing and phenotyped for 14 important traits in 44 location‐year environments between 2015 and 2017. All data are freely available at the Triticeae Toolbox ( https://triticeaetoolbox.org/barley/ ), and we describe several on‐tap projects and breeding advances that are exploiting this resource. We believe this panel and dataset will be useful for answering important breeding questions related to genomewide selection and GEIs and developing locally superior barley cultivars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it