MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921829478 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2019.2899573

A 2.3-mW 26.3-GHz $G_{m}$ -Boosted Differential Colpitts VCO With 20% Tuning Range in 65-nm CMOS

2019· article· en· W2921829478 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC MicrosystemsIntel Corporation
KeywordsVoltage-controlled oscillatorColpitts oscillatorCMOSdBcPhase noiseElectrical engineeringCapacitorVariable capacitorFigure of meritElectronic engineeringInductorMaterials scienceVoltageEngineeringOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an architecture for differential Colpitts voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs) in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) that utilizes three design techniques to extend the tuning range (TR) of the VCO, while maintaining a low phase noise (PN) and a low power consumption. First, a switched-capacitor bank based on a variable capacitive feedback technique is introduced to achieve a wide TR with a minimal PN degradation. Second, a Gm-boosting technique using interstage inductors is employed to lower the power consumption and relax VCO startup issues. Third, a dynamic forward-body self-biased technique is used to further reduce the power consumption and PN of the proposed structure. As a proof of concept, a 26.3-GHz differential Colpitts VCO is designed and fabricated in a 65-nm CMOS process. Based on the measurement results, the VCO achieves a PN of -122.1 dBc/Hz at 10-MHz offset from the center frequency, and a TR of 20%. The circuit consumes 2.3 mW from a 1-V supply and excluding the pads occupies a 0.22 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of silicon area. Compared to the recently published CMOS VCOs within the same frequency range, the proposed VCO simultaneously achieves a wide TR, low power dissipation, and low PN, resulting in a figure of merit (FOM) and FOM incorporating the TR (FOMT) of -187 and -193 dBc/Hz at 10-MHz offset from the center frequency, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it