A44 ELUXADOLINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ABDOMINAL PAIN IN ADULTS WITH DIARRHEA-PREDOMINANT IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME WHO REPORT INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO LOPERAMIDE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is characterized by recurrent abdominal pain and diarrhea. Eluxadoline (ELX) is a mixed µ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist and δ-opioid receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of IBS-D in adults. To examine the efficacy of ELX for treating abdominal pain in adults with IBS-D reporting inadequate response to loperamide. In a Phase 4 clinical trial (RELIEF) conducted in Canada and the US, adults with IBS-D who reported inadequate symptom control with loperamide in the previous 12 months were randomized to oral ELX (100 mg twice daily) or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Patients recorded their daily IBS-D symptoms including worst abdominal pain (WAP) [reported on a scale of 0–10, where 0 is equal to no pain and 10 is equal to the worst imaginable pain]. Baseline WAP score was calculated as an average score in the week before randomization. Proportions of patients achieving ≥30%, ≥40%, and ≥50% improvements in WAP scores from baseline for ≥50% of treatment days were calculated weekly, for the 12-week treatment period and for each 4-week interval (Weeks 1–4, Weeks 5–8, and Weeks 9–12). Overall, 346 patients were randomized, 174 to PBO and 172 to ELX. Patients’ WAP scores decreased over time, with a notably lower WAP score in the ELX group after approximately 3 weeks and maintained over 12 weeks of treatment (Figure). Patients in the ELX group reported higher mean weekly WAP scores compared to placebo from baseline to Week 2, and lower scores from Weeks 3 to 12. The proportion of WAP responders at Weeks 1–12 and Weeks 5–8 were significantly higher with ELX than with PBO at all three pain improvement thresholds, while at Weeks 9–12, the proportion of WAP responders was only significantly greater in the ELX group compared to the PBO group at the ≥50% improvement threshold (Table). A significantly greater percentage of patients treated with ELX experienced improvements in the abdominal pain component of their IBS-D over a 12-week treatment period, suggesting that ELX is effective for treating abdominal pain in patients with IBS-D who have reported inadequate response to loperamide. This study was supported by Allergan plc. Writing assistance by Complete HealthVizion based on detailed feedback from all authors, funded by Allergan plc. Proportion of WAP responders at ≥30%, ≥40%, and ≥50% improvement from baseline thresholds aDefined as patients achieving the defined percent improvement from baseline in WAP for ≥50% of treatment days; *p<0.05 vs. placebo; **p≤0.01 vs. placebo; WAP, worst abdominal pain Allergan plc
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".