Pipeline embolisation device with shield technology for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flow diverters have emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for patients with complex unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Their utilisation in patients with ruptured aneurysms poses significant challenges, most notably the need for periprocedural dual antiplatelet medication. We describe the use of the pipeline embolisation device with shield technology in an 88-year-old patient with a complex ruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysm not amenable to microsurgical clipping or coiling alone. The pipeline embolisation device with shield technology utilises a phosphorylcholine coating to decrease thrombotic risk. We describe our antithrombotic protocol and technique to decrease the risk of acute re-rupture. The case highlights the option of using a flow diversion device with antithrombotic coatings in patients with complex ruptured cerebral aneurysms not amenable to coiling or microsurgical clipping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".