MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The molecular hallmarks and clinical consequences of tumor hypoxia in prostate cancer.

2019· article· en· W2921967070 on OpenAlexaff
Vinayak Bhandari, Lydia Liu, Shadrielle Espirritu, Emilie Lalonde, Takafumi N. Yamaguchi, Lawrence E. Heisler, Julie Livingstone, Vincent Huang, Yu-Jia Shiah, Veronica Y. Sabelnykova, Fouad Yousif, Michael Fraser, Melvin L.K. Chua, Theodorus van der Kwast, Stanley K. Liu, Paul C. Boutros, Robert G. Bristow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerMedicineProstateProstatectomyPTENHypoxia (environmental)OncologyBiomarkerMetastasisBiochemical recurrenceInternal medicineCancerPathologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

81 Background: Localised prostate cancers are classified into risk-groups using clinical measurements like grade and stage to inform treatment decisions. However, these groupings are imprecise: ~30% of intermediate-risk patients suffer relapse of their disease despite precision image-guided radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. One reason for this variability in response to treatment is the underlying cellular and molecular heterogeneity of tumours. Prostate tumour cells exist within a microenvironment characterized by gradients of oxygen levels and prostate tumours with low levels of oxygen (hypoxia) have poor clinical outcomes. Methods: Hypoxia was measured using multiple mRNA-based signatures. We examined 548 patients with localised prostate cancer and statistically assessed the association of hypoxia with copy-number alterations (CNAs), single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), genomic rearrangements, focal genomic events ( i.e. kataegis, chromothripsis), telomere length, clinical indices ( i.e. grade, stage) and subclonal architecture. Results: Elevated hypoxia was associated with allelic loss of PTEN, higher rates of chromothripsis and intraductal and cribriform carcinoma (IDC-CA). To translate these findings into a biomarker for prostate cancer precision medicine, we integrated tumour microenvironmental data with genomic and pathological information to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups. Patients with localized prostate cancer that have polyclonal tumours with elevated hypoxia, allelic loss of PTEN and IDC-CA were at the highest risk of rapid biochemical failure (P = 3.48 x10-3, Logrank test) and metastasis (P = 4.61 x 10-3, Logrank test), even after controlling for T-category, Gleason score and pre-treatment PSA. Conclusions: These data suggest that the aggressiveness of prostate cancers is driven by the interplay of the tumour microenvironment, tumour evolutionary trajectories and its genomic mutational profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→