Is the cardioprotective effect of the ACE2 activator diminazene aceturate more potent than the ACE inhibitor enalapril on acute myocardial infarction in rats?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myocardial infarction is a major cause of cardiac dysfunction. All components of the cardiac renin-angiotensin system (RAS) are upregulated in myocardial infarction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and ACE2 are key enzymes involved in synthesis of components of RAS and provide a counter-regulatory mechanism within RAS. We compared the cardioprotective effect of the ACE2 activator diminazene aceturate (DIZE) versus the ACE inhibitor enalapril on post acute myocardial infarction (AMI) ventricular dysfunction in rats. Adult male rats received subcutaneous injections of either saline (control) or isoproterenol (85 mg/kg) to induce AMI. Rats with AMI confirmed biochemically and by ECG, were either left untreated (AMI) or administered DIZE (AMI + DIZE) or enalapril (AMI + enalapril) daily for 4 weeks. DIZE caused a significant activation of cardiac ACE2 compared with enalapril. DIZE caused a significantly greater enhancement of cardiac hemodynamics. DIZE also caused greater reductions in heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), β-myosin heavy chain (β-MYH), and in heart mass to total body mass ratio. These results indicated that activation of cardiac ACE2 by DIZE enhanced the protective axis of RAS and improved myocardial function following AMI, whereas enalapril was not sufficient to restore all cardiac parameters back to normal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".