Variation of actin filament length in dogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the smallest functional unit of force production, the sarcomeres are important in determining muscle function. Actin filament lengths, which are important in determining optimal sarcomere length for a species, have not yet been reported in dogs. This study aims to provide a species-specific value for actin filament length in dogs, while examining intraspecies, intermuscular and intramuscular variations. Muscle samples were taken from the tibialis anterior muscle, the lateral gastrocnemius muscle head and the medial gastrocnemius muscle head in 10 dogs including a Labrador, a Belgian Malinois, a Caucasian Shepherd, German Shepherds and some mixed-breed dogs. Actin filament lengths were determined through transmission electron microscopy. Mean actin filament length across all muscle samples was 0.90 ± 0.01 μm. The low intraspecies variation, combined with a lack of important inter- and intramuscular variation found in this study, affirms the use of a species-specific optimal sarcomere length of 1.89 μm for canine muscles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".