MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mature results from EV-101: A phase I study of enfortumab vedotin in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC).

2019· article· en· W2922015761 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Srikala S. Sridhar, Jingsong Zhang, David C. Smith, Joseph D. Ruether, Thomas W. Flaig, Joaquina Baranda, Joshua M. Lang, Elizabeth R. Plimack, Randeep Sangha, Elisabeth I. Heath, Jaime R. Merchan, David I. Quinn, Sandy Srinivas, Matthew I. Milowsky, Chunzhang Wu, Elaina M. Gartner, Amal Melhem‐Bertrandt, Daniel P. Petrylak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsBaker Hughes (Canada)Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineTolerabilityGastroenterologyCancerAnemiaChemotherapyBladder cancerOncologyAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

377 Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody–drug conjugate that delivers MMAE, a microtubule disrupting agent, to tumors expressing Nectin-4, a protein found on most urothelial cancers. Preliminary results of the EV-101 study (NCT02091999) suggest EV is active and tolerable. Methods: Patients with mUC treated with ≥1 prior chemotherapy, or those ineligible for cisplatin, received EV 1.25 mg/kg on Day 1, 8, and 15 every 28 day cycle. The primary objective was tolerability; antitumor activity (ORR per RECIST v1.1), assessed every 8 wk, was a secondary objective. Results: As of14 Sept 2018,112 pts with mUC received EV with a median follow up of 13.4 mo. Bladder was the primary tumor site in 86 pts (77%) and 33 (29.5%) had liver metastases (LM). Nearly all pts received prior platinum chemotherapy; 89 (79.5%) received prior anti-PD(L)1. EV was well tolerated; fatigue (53%), alopecia (46%), and decreased appetite (42%) were the most commonly reported treatment-related AEs (TRAEs). Anemia (8%), hyponatremia (7%), UTI (7%), and hyperglycemia (6%) were the grade ≥3 AEs reported in ≥5% of pts regardless of attribution; 4 fatal TRAEs were reported (respiratory failure, urinary tract obstruction, diabetic ketoacidosis, multi-organ failure). Confirmed ORR was 42% (CR, n = 5; PR, n = 42). Among responders, median duration of response was 7.7 mo (95% CI 5.6, 9.6) and 23.4% of responses were ongoing with a median follow up of 11.3 mo. Estimated median PFS and OS were 5.4 mo (95% CI 5.1, 6.3) and 12.5 mo (95% CI 9.3, 16.1), respectively; OS at 1 yr was 51.8%. Similar results were seen in pts with prior anti-PD(L)1 and with LM (Table). Conclusions: Single-agent EV was generally well tolerated and provided encouraging response and survival data in a population with an unmet medical need including pts with LM, which is associated with poor prognosis. Phase 2 and 3 monotherapy studies as well as evaluation of combination therapies are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02091999. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207