MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922147230 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2018-0230

Genome-wide identification and analyses of bHLH family genes in <i>Brassica napus</i>

2019· article· en· W2922147230 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Shen, Xin Cui, Hui Li, Rui‐Min Teng, Yongxin Wang, Hao Liu, Jing Zhuang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Gene Expression Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyGenomeBrassicaGeneticsBrassica rapaGeneBrassica oleraceaTranscription factorGene familyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bHLH (basic/helix-loop-helix) protein is one of the largest transcription factors (TFs) that is essential in regulating plant growth and development. Although the bHLH family has been identified in some organisms, a systemic study has not been performed in Brassica napus, which is the third most important oilseed crop worldwide. In the present study, a total of 460 bHLH TFs were identified from the genome of B. napus and clustered into 25 subfamilies. Structural analysis was used to identify the DNA binding type and conserved amino residues of the identified sequence in the bHLH domain. In addition, a comparative genomic analysis of B. napus and its progenitors (Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea) and two basal angiosperms (Amborella trichopoda and Vitis vinifera) was performed to trace the change during expansion and evolution of the bHLH family. The bHLH TFs in leaves and roots showed various expression patterns. The homologs of the AA-subgenome and CC-subgenome exhibited similar expression patterns, but were more divergent between the homologs caused from other duplicate events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Gene Expression AnalysisFrench-language works237,207